I am in the incredibly fortunate position to have been able to have an EMS for my multi AC3 setup running for almost a year now. This has been brilliant, it works perfectly without fault.
My serious frustration is on behalf of others who are still struggling to solve the behaviour of their multi inverter setups, especially now that there is the latest write cycle issue that has come to light.
Michael Smith has worked incredibly hard behind the scenes at GE to bring the EMS to life, but as far as I can tell, the higher ups at GE seem to have been dragging their heels for the past 3 years in getting the EMS out. This is getting absolutely ridiculous. There are working Hybrid and AC3 EMS versions that exist but GE refuses to push through the EMS.
The write cycles issue, the cross charging issue, the balancing issue, the portal issue, and the usability issues (not fit for purpose springs to mind) will ALL disappear if GE just release the EMS. So instead of telling those that have spent time writing these scripts to go and make changes to solve GE's problem, how about GE solve the problem with the solution they already have but are too intent on getting new products out to market to care about the existing customers that have put their trust and significant sums of money into the hands of GE.
GivEnergy stated at the time of both mine and others' purchases that multi inverter systems were, and I quote, "not recommended". Given the issues people have found, if GE were not willing to push out a widely available EMS, they should have said "not supported" as they are two very different things.
I really hope GE decides to try and restore some faith in its customers and solve the issues above with the EMS. Along with fixing the ongoing battery issues. I cannot recommend GE to anyone until they solve these problems and will point them towards a Powerwall.
Finally instead of bashing Predbat or balance inverters, how about we focus on were the real solution should lie... at the foot of GE.







